Skip to content

LimbusHealth Assess · In development

Adult ADHD assessment software for patients and doctors.

Limbus prepares a draft assessment report for doctor review.

Before the appointment, the patient completes a guided history, screening questionnaires, and an adaptive text interview. Each finding in the draft links back to the answer it came from. The doctor reviews and corrects the report, speaks with the patient, and decides whether ADHD is the right diagnosis.

For patients, physicians, and clinical organizations · joining does not promise access or a launch date

Illustrative pathway showing patient intake, questionnaires, a text interview, and doctor review

PATIENT INTAKE

History and concerns

SCREENING

ADHD and related symptoms

TEXT INTERVIEW

Adaptive follow-up

DOCTOR REVIEW

Evidence, corrections, diagnosis

Illustrative pathway · fictional content · not product output
Current statusLimbusHealth Assess · SaMD in development · Canadian pathway unresolved · Not authorized for clinical use
  • Patient history
  • Functional impact
  • Childhood onset
  • Screening context
  • Competing explanations
  • Source-linked findings
  • Visible uncertainty
  • Doctor review

LimbusHealth Assess · Method

What the patient does. What Limbus prepares. What the doctor decides.

Limbus collects and organizes the pre-appointment information into a draft assessment report. It does not replace the doctor’s own interview, judgment, or diagnosis.

Join the Assess waitlist

Patient intake

History and concerns, completed before the visit.

The patient records current concerns, day-to-day impact, childhood history, health history, and context in a guided intake they can complete before the appointment.

Illustrative pathway view · stage 1 of 3 · not product output

Screening questionnaires

ADHD symptoms and related concerns, in one place.

The patient completes structured screening questions. Scores help guide what to ask next; they do not become a diagnosis on their own.

Illustrative pathway view · stage 2 of 3 · not product output

Adaptive text interview

Follow-up questions respond to the patient’s answers.

Assess asks about ADHD criteria, day-to-day impairment, childhood onset, possible alternative explanations, and safety concerns. Each finding stays linked to the answer it came from.

Illustrative pathway view · stage 3 of 3 · not product output

Doctor review

One draft to review, not a diagnosis to accept.

The doctor receives the source-linked draft, checks each finding, speaks with the patient, corrects what is wrong or incomplete, and decides whether ADHD is the right diagnosis. Nothing is finalized until the doctor reviews and signs it.

One assessment · two connected experiences

The patient and doctor use different sides of the same assessment.

Each role keeps its own responsibilities: what you bring to the assessment, what you get back, and what stays yours to decide.

Patient perspective

Complete the history before the appointment, one clear step at a time.

Work through each step at your own pace before the appointment. Nothing asks you to interpret the information or diagnose yourself.

You provide
History, concerns, context
You receive
A clear place in a doctor-led assessment
The doctor owns
Conversation, interpretation, decision
Join the Assess waitlist

Doctor perspective

Open one draft with the evidence beside each finding.

Every finding sits beside the answer it came from, with missing information, contradictions, and possible alternatives flagged for your review.

You receive
A structured, traceable draft
You inspect
Evidence, gaps, alternatives
You own
Clinical review and sign-off
See a doctor-corrected example

Clinical organization perspective

A defined assessment process with a doctor visibly responsible at the end.

Assess is being developed around structured patient input, traceable records, doctor review, and a clear separation between software output and the final clinical decision.

The workflow keeps
Roles and handoffs explicit
The record keeps
Sources and uncertainty visible
The organization keeps
Its clinical governance authority
Examine the clinical approach

Human in the loop · Illustration

A draft should look like a draft.

This fictional example is not output from the Limbus system. It shows the intended accountability boundary: the software organizes a draft; a doctor questions it, corrects it, and decides.

Limbus Assess · Structured summary

DraftCountersigned
Case LH-0000 · EXAMPLEReviewer: physician · illustrative record

Presenting concern: longstanding distractibility, disorganization, missed deadlines, and functional difficulty at work.

Screening: ADHD and functional-impairment screens elevated · mood, anxiety, sleep, substance, and safety screens reviewed.

Draft impression: adult ADHD, combined presentation(confidence: high).

Late task completion attributed to inattention.

Working conclusion: ADHD is the leading explanation.

Routed to the reviewing doctor with the full evidence trail.

Reviewed and countersigned by a doctor.

Every case, by design: a design principle of a device in development, not a performance claim.

Illustrative example of a clinical record under review: the system drafts in monospace; a reviewing doctor marks three corrections in the margin (holding an over-confident impression, preserving sleep as competing evidence, and widening the review set), then countersigns. The record's state moves from draft to countersigned.

Fictional example for illustration · Limbus is in development and not authorized for clinical use

Clinical leadership

Clinical judgment shaped the product from the start.

Limbus is built around the realities of assessment and treatment: limited appointment time, overlapping symptoms, incomplete records, and decisions that still require accountable human judgment.

Clinical direction

Dr. Marie Claire Bourque

MD, FRCPC · Psychiatrist

Royal College–certified and practicing in British Columbia and Ontario, with experience across emergency, inpatient, and outpatient care.

What clinical leadership changes

Evidence
Findings should remain traceable to what the patient actually provided.
Uncertainty
Missing information, contradictions, and competing explanations should stay visible.
Responsibility
By design, software should remain subordinate to the treating doctor’s judgment, review, correction, and decision.

The products

What Limbus is building.

LimbusHealth Assess, the adult ADHD assessment product this page describes, is the current focus. LimbusHealth Treat is a separate OCD treatment product, also in development. Both support clinician-led care; neither replaces it.

Current focus · adult ADHD · in development

The assessment workflow this page walks through.

Structured patient input, a source-linked draft, and a doctor's review and decision, in the method shown above.

Also in development · OCD CBT/ERP

Structured treatment. Clinician-directed care.

LimbusHealth Treat is clinician-directed digital CBT with ERP for adults with OCD. AI is optional and subordinate; suitability, treatment changes, safety, and discharge stay with the treating clinician.

Follow Treat in general Limbus updates

General updates are separate from the Assess waitlist

Before you join

Questions worth answering directly.

For patients & doctors

What does LimbusHealth Assess actually do?

Assess is adult ADHD assessment software for patients and doctors. Before the appointment, the patient completes a guided history, screening questionnaires, and an adaptive text interview. Limbus organizes the answers into a source-linked draft assessment report. The doctor reviews and corrects it, speaks with the patient, and decides whether ADHD is the right diagnosis.

Does LimbusHealth Assess make diagnoses on its own?

No. Limbus prepares a draft for review; it does not give the patient a diagnosis or replace the doctor’s assessment. The doctor checks the source evidence, corrects the draft, resolves uncertainty, and makes the clinical decision.

Is Limbus authorized for clinical use?

Not yet. LimbusHealth Assess is software as a medical device in development for adult ADHD assessment. Its Canadian classification and authorization pathway remains unresolved, and it is not authorized for clinical use (as of August 2026).

Access & privacy

Can I use Limbus now?

Not yet. Patients can join the Assess waitlist to hear about future access. Joining is not an appointment request or self-diagnosis, and it does not promise access. Join the Assess waitlist.

What happens to my information?

The Assess waitlist collects your email, whether you are joining as a patient, doctor, or clinical organization, and an optional organization name. It does not ask for symptoms, diagnoses, referral details, or patient records. You can ask us to delete the record at any time. Details are in our privacy policy.

About Limbus

What’s the difference between LimbusHealth Assess and LimbusHealth Treat?

Assess is being developed to support patients and doctors through adult ADHD assessment. Treat is a separate, clinician-directed CBT with ERP product for adults with OCD. They have different clinical purposes, evidence, and release decisions; neither is currently available for clinical use.

Who leads the clinical direction?

Limbus was founded and is clinically led by Dr. Marie Claire Bourque, MD, FRCPC, a practicing psychiatrist in British Columbia and Ontario. A full press kit is at limbushealth.ai/press.

Assess waitlist

Join the list for future Assess access.

Choose whether you are joining as a patient, doctor, or clinical organization. We will contact this list about possible patient access, clinician pilots, and other opportunities to use Assess. It is not available for clinical use today, and joining is not a request for an assessment or a promise of access.

For
Patients, doctors & clinics
Purpose
Future access
Status
In development

ASSESS INTEREST RECORD

DOUBLE OPT-IN

Use this field only for a clinic or organization name. Do not include health information.

Want company news rather than future Assess access?Get general Limbus updates.